GUIDE

GUIDE

GUIDE

Canals vs Proton.ai vs Conexiom (2026): Which Fits Your Distribution Business?

Pick Canals for order entry plus AP and PO tracking from one vendor, especially at an electrical, plumbing or HVAC distributor on Eclipse or Prophet 21. Pick Proton.ai for order and quote entry on the same platform as your CRM, product data and ecommerce. Pick Conexiom for high-volume order and invoice capture across its 40+ supported ERPs. None of the three publishes a price.

6 min

Pick Canals for order entry plus AP and PO tracking from one vendor, especially at an electrical, plumbing or HVAC distributor on Eclipse or Prophet 21. Pick Proton.ai for order and quote entry on the same platform as your CRM, product data and ecommerce. Pick Conexiom for high-volume order and invoice capture across its 40+ supported ERPs. None of the three publishes a price.

Morsa publishes this guide. It is not one of the three; it appears once, at the end, for buyers whose problem starts after the order. Every vendor fact was read on the vendor’s own site, or in the trade press where noted, on 12 October 2026.

Who each fits

  • Canals: a North American distributor in electrical, plumbing, HVAC or industrial supply that wants sales, AP and purchasing work from one vendor.

  • Proton.ai: a distributor that wants order entry, CRM, product data and ecommerce on one data layer.

  • Conexiom: a large or multi-ERP distributor whose main job is turning high volumes of orders and invoices into clean ERP data.

How do Canals, Proton.ai and Conexiom compare?

Each cell is the vendor’s own wording or our summary of it, read 12 October 2026.

Scope

  • Canals: Sales, customer service, AP, AR, purchasing and receiving

  • Proton.ai: CRM, PIM, ecommerce, order and quote entry

  • Conexiom: Order and invoice capture, validation and analytics

Order entry

  • Canals: Yes; reps approve before the ERP

  • Proton.ai: Yes; reps approve

  • Conexiom: Yes; “ERP-ready data”

Quoting

  • Canals: Yes, plus takeoffs

  • Proton.ai: Yes, with contract pricing and substitutes

  • Conexiom: RFQ capture

AP

  • Canals: Yes, plus AR and statement reconciliation

  • Proton.ai: Not in product list

  • Conexiom: Invoice capture

PO tracking

  • Canals: Yes, reads acknowledgments and updates ship dates; receipt tracking

  • Proton.ai: Not in product list

  • Conexiom: Vendor acknowledgement (VOA) capture

CRM

  • Canals: Integrates with Salesforce and Zoho

  • Proton.ai: Yes, Proton CRM

  • Conexiom: Not in product list

ERPs listed

  • Canals: 14 entries, incl. Eclipse, P21, Infor SX.e and CSD, NetSuite, Dynamics 365, SAP S/4HANA, AS400

  • Proton.ai: P21, Eclipse, Infor SX.e, SAP S/4HANA and ECC, NetSuite, AS/400, “20+ others”

  • Conexiom: “40+ ERPs,” incl. P21, Eclipse, Kinetic, Dynamics 365, NetSuite, Sage X3, SAP

Pricing

  • Canals: Quote only

  • Proton.ai: Quote only

  • Conexiom: Quote only

Go-live it states

  • Canals: “2 weeks from kickoff to go-live”

  • Proton.ai: Not published

  • Conexiom: “30-day average”

Funding

  • Canals: $35M led by Base10 Partners (May 2026)

  • Proton.ai: $20M Series A led by Felicis (January 2022, per MDM)

  • Conexiom: $130M from Warburg Pincus (September 2021)

Scale it claims

  • Canals: 8M+ sales orders, $5B payables

  • Proton.ai: 100,000+ lines in one day

  • Conexiom: 1.5B+ line items a year

Published customers

  • Canals: DSG, The Kendall Group, Locke Supply, Turtle; “over 100 distributors”

  • Proton.ai: MSC, Vallen, ORS Nasco, R.S. Hughes, BPI

  • Conexiom: Proax, Field Fasteners, Protective Industrial Products (Epicor release)

Which is best for an electrical distributor on Eclipse?

All three list Epicor Eclipse, so the ERP alone does not decide it. The published electrical proof does.

Canals has the most. Its AD page reads “Preferred AI Provider for AD Members” and “Trusted by 50+ AD Members.” Its May 2026 release names DSG, which serves electrical, HVAC, plumbing and waterworks customers. In it Paul Kennedy, DSG’s CEO and then chair of the board of the National Association of Electrical Distributors, said: “Canals is now our gold standard for how technology can continue driving the business forward.” The same AD page quotes United Electric: “Canals is a force multiplier for United Electric.”

Conexiom expanded its Epicor partnership on 14 July 2026 to reach Eclipse and Prophet 21 users, and cites “hundreds of joint customers” with Epicor.

Proton.ai lists Eclipse, but the customers quoted on its homepage are industrial, building products, dental and other distributors; we found no electrical distributor named on the pages we read.

Verdict: Canals, then Conexiom if your order volume is very high.

Which handles the most ERPs?

Conexiom, by its own count. Its homepage claims “Pre-built, native integrations with 40+ ERPs” and “Zero ERP changes” required, and its logo strip runs from Prophet 21, Eclipse and Epicor Kinetic to Infor, Dynamics 365, NetSuite, Sage X3, SAP ECC and SAP S/4HANA.

Proton.ai names six connectors (Prophet 21, Eclipse, Infor SX.e, SAP S/4HANA and ECC, NetSuite, IBM AS/400) and adds “20+ others,” which puts it at 26 or more if each counts.

Canals lists 14 entries, including AS400, Bizowie, SHIMS and “Custom ERP,” and says its team “can typically build an integration for you in just a few weeks” for a system not on the list. It also lists Outlook, Teams, RingCentral and Front for the messages that carry orders.

A count is not a fit. Ask each vendor whether its connector writes orders into your exact ERP version, or only reads data, and how long that took for its last customer on the same system.

Which covers AP and PO tracking?

Canals covers the most of the back office. Beyond order entry it sells accounts payable, accounts receivable and statement reconciliation, and its homepage shows “96% touchless invoice processing.” For purchasing, its PO tracking “reads” each order acknowledgment, updates the PO’s ship dates and quantities, and flags discrepancies, and its receipt tracking matches packing slips to POs. The PO tracking page says you can “Get up-and-running in under a week.”

Conexiom covers the documents. Its Epicor release lists “request for quotes, sales orders, AP invoices, vendor acknowledgements, and more,” turned into ERP data. It does not describe chasing a supplier or following a date change through to customers.

Proton.ai does neither today. Its product list is CRM, PIM, eCommerce AI and Order & Quote Entry AI, with Inventory AI and Pricing AI marked “Coming soon.”

If AP and PO tracking matter as much as order entry, Canals is the only one of the three built for all of it.

Which goes live fastest?

On published figures, Canals. Its homepage shows “2 weeks from kickoff to go-live,” with a plan of “Day 1: Sync” and “Week 1: Launch,” and says the ERP integration “takes only about an hour or two of your IT team’s time on average.” Conexiom states a “30-day average” implementation, “Not 30 months.” Proton.ai publishes no implementation time on the pages we read; its order and quote entry page asks buyers to talk to its team for pricing and implementation details.

These are each vendor’s own numbers, not independent measurements, and none says what counts as live. A go-live with one branch and ten customers is not the same as all branches on every order type. Ask for the date in writing, the scope that date covers, and a reference customer on your ERP who went live in the last six months.

Where does Morsa fit if your problem is after the order?

All three get the order into the ERP. The loss often comes later, when a supplier moves a ship date and the customer hears on the day. Morsa, an AI COO for operations, reads that signal, such as a supplier email, a message or a moved date in the ERP, finds every order and customer it touches, chases the supplier, updates the customer, and closes the item on proof, such as a goods receipt in the ERP. It also handles order entry and quoting, but that is not where it is strongest. People keep working in the email, Teams or WhatsApp threads they already use.

Built and proven in manufacturing, now onboarding our first distributors. At J4S, a 120-person glass plant, on-time completion of about 900 commitments went from about 30% to about 75% in four weeks. Sunil K Verma, J4S’s Plant Head: “I used to spend the first hour of every morning reconstructing yesterday. Now the chasing happens in the WhatsApp groups my supervisors already use, whether or not I remember.”

Field

Morsa

Scope

Order entry, quoting, supplier and PO chasing, delivery-date commitments, customer updates, shortages

ERPs listed

SAP Business One, Dynamics 365 (incl. Business Central), NetSuite, Odoo, Zoho, QuickBooks; others by API, database, export or email trail

Pricing

Pilot first; then a share of measured value; no public price

Go-live

2 days from first connection at J4S (manufacturing)

Published customers

Distribution customers: none yet (manufacturing live)

If order entry is your main problem, pick one of the three above. Book a demo: https://cal.com/morsa

Sources

  1. Canals, homepage, integrations, PO tracking page, AD page and Canals Raises $35M (28 May 2026), read 12 October 2026, canals.ai

  2. Canals, AI Purchase Order Tracking, read 12 October 2026, canals.ai

  3. Canals, Preferred AI Provider for AD Members, read 12 October 2026, canals.ai/ad

  4. Proton.ai, homepage and order and quote entry page, read 12 October 2026, proton.ai

  5. Proton.ai, launch post, 21 July 2026, read 12 October 2026, proton.ai

  6. Modern Distribution Management, Proton.ai Closes $20M in Funding, 18 January 2022, read 12 October 2026, mdm.com

  7. Conexiom, homepage, read 12 October 2026, conexiom.com

  8. Conexiom, Conexiom Expands Strategic Partnership With Epicor, 14 July 2026, read 12 October 2026, conexiom.com

  9. Conexiom, Conexiom Announces $130M Growth Investment From Warburg Pincus, 28 September 2021, read 12 October 2026, conexiom.com

  10. Morsa, J4S customer story, read 12 October 2026, morsa.ai/customers/j4s

Changelog

  • 12 October 2026: first published. Twelve fields compared across Canals, Proton.ai and Conexiom from each vendor’s own site.

KEEP READING

KEEP READING

KEEP READING

Related pages

GUIDE

GUIDE

GUIDE

Conexiom Alternatives for Distributors (2026): 8 Options Compared

The strongest Conexiom alternatives for a mid-size distributor are Canals (order entry, AP and PO tracking, over 100 distributors by its count), Proton.ai (order and quote entry on a CRM and catalog platform), Ordermatic (phone, fax and legacy ERPs such as AS/400), Y Meadows (free up to 50 orders a month) and Esker (a finance-led order-to-cash suite). All are quote only beyond Y Meadows' free tier. Conexiom itself publishes 40+ native ERP integrations and a 30-day average implementation.

Read the page

›

GUIDE

GUIDE

GUIDE

Canals AI Alternatives for Distributors (2026): 8 Options Compared

Canals is the hardest distributor AI to replace: it claims over 100 distributors, raised $35 million in May 2026 and says it is the preferred AI provider for AD members. The right alternative depends on which part you need. Proton.ai and Distro compete on quoting and order entry, Conexiom on high-volume capture across the 40+ ERPs it lists, Prokeep on customer texting, Didero and Leverage AI on PO follow-up, and Augment on order entry plus supplier chasing.

Read the page

›

GUIDE

GUIDE

GUIDE

AI Order Entry for Distributors: The Sales Order Automation Guide

AI order entry, which the software market calls sales order automation, reads a customer's order wherever it arrives, matches each line to your item master, checks price and stock in the ERP, and creates a draft sales order for a person to approve or post. Vendors report that 50% to 97% of orders go through without rekeying, depending on the vendor and what it counts.

Read the page

›

FAQs

FAQs

FAQs

Questions people ask

Questions people ask

Still have a question? A founder will answer.

01

What is the difference between Canals, Proton.ai and Conexiom?

Canals covers order entry plus AP, AR and PO tracking from one vendor. Proton.ai puts order and quote entry on the same data layer as its CRM, product data and ecommerce. Conexiom turns high volumes of orders, RFQs, vendor acknowledgements and invoices into clean ERP data across the 40+ ERPs it lists. None of the three publishes a price.

02

Which is best for an electrical distributor on Eclipse?

Canals, then Conexiom if your order volume is very high. All three list Epicor Eclipse, so the published electrical proof decides it. Canals' AD page reads "Preferred AI Provider for AD Members," and its May 2026 release names DSG. Conexiom expanded its Epicor partnership on 14 July 2026 for Eclipse and Prophet 21 users. We found no electrical distributor named on the Proton.ai pages we read.

03

Which one supports the most ERPs?

Conexiom, by its own count: "Pre-built, native integrations with 40+ ERPs." Proton.ai names six connectors and adds "20+ others." Canals lists 14 entries, including AS400 and "Custom ERP," and says its team "can typically build an integration for you in just a few weeks." A count is not a fit, so ask whether the connector writes orders into your exact ERP version or only reads data.

04

Which one goes live fastest?

On published figures, Canals, which shows "2 weeks from kickoff to go-live." Conexiom states a "30-day average" implementation, and Proton.ai publishes no implementation time on the pages we read. These are each vendor's own numbers, and none says what counts as live. Ask for the date in writing, the scope it covers, and a reference customer on your ERP who went live in the last six months.

05

Do Canals, Proton.ai or Conexiom handle AP and PO tracking?

Canals is the only one of the three built for all of it. It sells AP, AR and statement reconciliation, and its PO tracking reads each acknowledgment, updates ship dates and quantities, and flags discrepancies. Conexiom captures AP invoices and vendor acknowledgements but does not describe chasing a supplier. Proton.ai does neither today, and its Inventory AI and Pricing AI are marked "Coming soon."

06

Where does Morsa fit next to Canals, Proton.ai and Conexiom?

After the order. All three get the order into the ERP; Morsa's strength is what happens when a supplier moves a ship date. It reads that signal, finds every order and customer it touches, chases the supplier, updates the customer and closes the item on proof. It has no distribution customers yet; it is built and proven in manufacturing. If order entry is your main problem, pick one of the three.

WHERE MORSA FITS

WHERE MORSA FITS

WHERE MORSA FITS

Find out where AI could make your plant more money.

Answer a few questions about your plant. We come back with a free Manufacturing AI Profitability Plan, and we tell you honestly if we are not the right fit.

Machines, people, and vendors, finally in one. We start with yours.

For queries, feedback or suggestions

© 2026 Lunar Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Machines, people, and vendors, finally in one. We start with yours.

For queries, feedback or suggestions

© 2026 Lunar Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Machines, people, and vendors, finally in one. We start with yours.

For queries, feedback or suggestions

© 2026 Lunar Inc. All Rights Reserved.